Zillow is now offering a "great deal" to agents: you can post your listings for FREE! What great exposure, and how kind of Zillow to offer such a wonderful service to agents without taking a dime-what a nice company!
I'm having two opposing thoughts about this. The first is the traditional one that I have always believed and that is this:
I do not understand why, like lambs to the slaughter, we continue to support and build entities that will put us out of business. Third parties like Zillow cannot (yet) compete with the MLS because they don't have the property information. So, wa-la, they ask agents to supply it for free (cause we love free and will do anything for exposure) and we provide them the very thing that will seal the fate of the MLS.
My second thought is coming from a new mindset since the writing of my book and that is this:
The MLS, as we know it, is terminal. Whether you believe that our MLS's sold us out or it's just the natural consequence of the free flow of information in the Internet age, the MLS, as THE place for property information is ending. To try to make it be like it used to be is like putting the toothpaste back in the tube. As much as we dislike the thought, I believe that buyers and sellers, armed with information that they got WITHOUT going through an agent, will find each other more and more. Many sellers who have time will do their own marketing activities and buyers will do more of their own house hunting without us.
This is why, especially during down periods like right now, that it is vital that we learn how to do real estate consulting. Because consulting is where our future is. The Internet is a wonderful thing and as we are seeing, can provide and distribute information like no human ever could. But what it can NEVER do is interpet what that information means - only a real estate professional with years of experience can do that. We know that most people lose money when they try to buy or sell on their own but where they lose it is not in the marketing and searching but from contract to close.
A seller finds their own buyer easy enough but doesn't have the foggiest idea of how to negotiate the contract, and even more importantly, how to troubleshoot the transaction to close. They get a pre-approval from a buyer and don't know if the lender is reputable or a scum-bag that will hold up their closing. They don't understand commitment dates and get hammered on inspection issues. Ditto the above for buyers.
Worse, because we have stubbornly stuck to the commission-only-sales model, there is no framework for hiring a real estate professional to provide this important contract to close counsel. Most people hire attorneys and attorneys cannot do what we do because they don't know what we know. They don't know property values so it's hard for them to negotiate a good contract, they don't know the good lenders from bad and they certainly will not babysit a transaction, making sure the dates are adhered to and everything goes as it should.
The value in learning consulting is not so that you can replace the transactions you do by commission with fees overnight. Most people, in the near future, that want full service may very well continue to want to pay by commission (though this is changing). The real value in learning consulting is that you develop streams of income that you never would have had because you can provide consultative services by the hour or a flat fee for the services that they would rather not do. And don't forget all the help that people need that don't involve a transaction: a re-financing decision, a move-versus-improve choice, tax abatement questions etc. We have been working for free for so long that we have given away, as an industry, hundreds of thousands of dollars.
When I see entities like Zillow continue to grow, I can't help but put out the clarion call that consulting is our future and it's a very good future for those who embrace it because you get paid for your knowledge, not your access. And while many "jobs" you do will pay you in the hundreds, not the thousands, the time you put in will be well paid and you will have time to devote to other clients. I am amazed when agents think that our $500 ACRE® course to learn this new model is expensive: shoot, you make it back in one consulting job. And you have built the skills you will need to survive in the future.
I have always been one to look ahead and I think that I'm pretty good at it: when I got into real estate I immediately built my first web site and had all the others laughing at me - they don't laugh anymore. I was the first in my office to get accredited in buyer representation - everyone told me that buyer agency would never go anywhere but they don't say that anymore. I see the future now as clear as day that our industry's future is being paid for what we know, our judgment and experience, not our access to the MLS. And the public will NOT hire us to provide objective counsel as long as we stubbornly stick to commissions only.
I love my industry but I want us to stop working for free and start getting paid what we're worth. The commission sales model worked when all we had to do was move product but now we are charged as Realtors with providing objective, fiduciary counsel to our clients and putting THEIR interests above our own. We can't continue to do that as commissioned salespeople - the public just doesn't believe that we will advise them against our own best interest and until we can provide them some choices, we will continue to see them go elsewhere.
So, the next time you see an entity like Zillow who's goal can only be to take your access and then put you out of business down the road, think about developing the tools that Zillow can NEVER provide - taking that mass of data and making sense of it all.
Powered by Ajax Comments
Mollie Wasserman said:
Hi David:
I actually don't think we are in disagreement.
Unlike many of my colleagues, I don't believe that access to housing data should be (or can be) exclusively through agents. While my initial feelings are why do we provide info to entities that will compete with us, as I said in my article, you cannot (nor should) restrict where data is coming from.
I would much rather be paid for my knowledge than my access and that is where my value is.
My concern is this: you may believe wholeheartedly that while Zillow provides information, consumers should go to a real estate professional to interpret it, that message is not getting out to the consumer. I can't tell you how many people believe that "Zestimates" are actually valid. Technology is a wonderful thing and can provide data like no human ever could. But what technology can never do is interpret it so that the client will not only buy or sell a home but do so for the best value.
I penned a Real Estate Internet Warning a few years back, and due to interest from others, had it copyrighted. I have it on my team site and it bears repeating:
REAL ESTATE INTERNET WARNING ©
Despite advertising claims to the contrary, the internet is NOT an experienced Real Estate Professional. It cannot consult, counsel, advise, have knowledge of local laws and market conditions, make judgments, own the result, or most importantly, understand your individual goals and needs and care about you as a Client. Furthermore, while the internet can provide information, it cannot interpret it. To obtain an accurate assessment of any data you're receiving online, please contact us.
If Zillow is in fact a starting point for people to gather housing info, I'm all for it. I just want to caution folks that just like they wouldn't read a medical textbook and diagnose themselves, when it comes to making sense of data on your largest financial asset, don't make decisions without consulting a pro.
Fortunately, you are no longer roped into paying a full commission when all you want is an hour or two of counsel. You can now hire a real estate consultant to provide you the guidance you need and pay for just what you want.
Have a wonderful holiday weekend David,
Mollie
Brian Brady said:
That last paragraph is the answer to the question "Why do you pay a Realtor?"
David G from Zillow.com said:
Think this through a bit more ....
The features Zillow launched this week have nothing to do with Zillow giving information to consumers - at all. What we added this week was multiple opportunities for Realtors & other professionals to give information to consumers on Zillow and be recognized for that contribution. You now have a new place to meet buyers and sellers online. You can answer consumers' questions on Zillow - you can ask sellers & owners questions on behalf of your clients - and you can let buyers in your neighborhood know what homes are for sale.
Now, think this through a bit more ....
Aren't our new features proof positive that consumers need the help of agents -- and that Zillow's committed to being the place that conversation happens? It would be kind of silly to invest in the products we launched this week to give Realtors a voice on Zillow if we actually believed we would replace them.
You are right -- consumers need local experts to help them make sense of the masses of RE data they now have at their fingertips. Where you are wrong is in missing the fact that the Zillow community is one of the best tools for doing that.
Why not give these new features a try - it's free to post your listings, answer Q&A and to put up a profile page.
Please, give it some thought.