Reserved (old pro) » Now you have choices » Choice: Risk Vs. Reward

Choice: Risk Vs. Reward

In real estate, quality is essential for keeping the most money in your pocket when you ultimately close. But should that mean that you are locked into paying by commission in order to get that quality? I believe the answer should be no.

Of course, after you have explored and weighed different options, based on your individual needs and comfort level, you may find, as many consumers do, that a traditional commission is the best choice for you. And that's perfectly fine. But you should make that choice because it's the BEST option, not because it's the ONLY option.

There is no question that when you pay for real estate services either by a flat fee or by the hour, you can save a lot of money. But unlike using a discount agent who agrees to cut their commission, you don't have to sacrifice the number OR the quality of the services you receive. Why is this? Because by choosing a flat fee for a bundle of services, or paying by the hour, you are receiving and paying for only the services or the time received. You are NOT receiving a guaranteed outcome, but, you also do not have to pay a premium for that guarantee - the "insurance" that if you don't achieve the desired outcome, you pay nothing. Therein lies the savings.

Actually, paying for services by fee or by the hour isn't that radical an idea. If you think about it, fees or hourly are how most professionals and service providers are paid.

Real estate professionals have traditionally been paid contingent on an outcome, even though no matter how skilled they are, they cannot control that outcome. The simple fact is the initial pricing of a home and the economic climate is what will determine how fast and for how much a home sells for.

Yet, with the traditional commission system, agents are paid as though they could control the outcome and that "insurance policy" of only paying if the house sells is what makes this method of compensation so expensive to the consumer.

When I explain to a potential seller how they can save a lot of money by paying for the time or services of an agent, rather than the outcome, the response I often get is "But what if the agent doesn't do a good job?" By that reasoning, you would have to question whether any service provider would do a good job if there pay was not contingent on the outcome.

As an example, a dentist is paid for their services and expertise, regardless of what dental issues come up. No matter how skilled the dentist is, he cannot control whether you only need twice-a-year cleanings or an abundance of root canals, bridges or implants. He might influence your future dental health by making suggestions on the care of your teeth, but he certainly cannot control what ultimately happens with your mouth; that depends on factors such as heredity and how diligently you care for your teeth. So if the dentist is paid for his services regardless of what comes up, how do you know that he will do a good job? The fact is you don't have a guarantee. That's why you usually don't pick a dentist from the phone book; it's far better to get a referral from someone who is already a content patient.

School teachers are paid a salary regardless of how many of their students ace the SAT's. They are paid, and promoted, based on their teaching skills, not necessarily how many students go on to college.

And so it is with most service providers. Obviously, if you pay for someone's services by non-contingent fee or by the hour, you need to have confidence that that provider will do quality work.

Although some consumers believe that a real estate agent will work harder knowing that they will only be paid if the house sells, the reality is that top-notch REALTORS®, like any other good service provider, work hard for their clients because they have a reputation for quality work that they want to protect and because they want to continue to receive a good share of their business by referral.

Now, I want to be very clear: paying for real estate services by non-contingent fees is not for everyone! As my Mom likes to say "That's why they make chocolate and vanilla." Some people (like my Mom) are risk-aversive, and they are better off paying for real estate services by traditional commission. There is nothing wrong with that as long as they understand that they are paying a premium to have no risk. At the same time, there are a growing number of folks, once understanding that the outcome is not controlled by the agent, whom are willing to forgo the guarantee and pay a lot less by fee, while still getting quality services and counsel.

Note: the above article is an excerpt from my book Ripping the Roof Off Real Estate.

Leave a comment

Recent Entries

  • Why & when would a consumer prefer hiring an Accredited Consultant in Real Estate?
    Mary Pope-Handy wrote:
    By Paula BeanAn ACRE can offer you both the traditional system of real estate services by commission as well a ...
  • 2 comments on this entry:
    • Merv said:
      You not only have the choice of a real estate professional or an ACRE® but when you hire an ACRE ...
    • Mollie Wasserman said:
      I couldn't have said it better Paula. Folks, Paula doesn't just call herself a consultant, she's been doing it for ...

  • Home Valuations, Paid by Fee (not commission)
    Mary Pope-Handy wrote:
    Sometimes you need to get some real estate help, you know it is going to take some time and effort ...
  • 1 comment on this entry:
    • Paula Bean said:
      Awesome post MPH! I particularly like the part about foreclosure. In Florida we are flooded with peole trying to do ...

  • Change #3: The ACRE® Course...Taught LIVE!
    Mollie Wasserman wrote:
    At the end of this month, we'll be embarking on a laboratory experiment: teaching the entire ACRE® course...to a live ...
  • 1 comment on this entry:
    • Randy Carson said:
      All the best on your upcoming LIVE training! ...

  • Change #2: New Course
    Mollie Wasserman wrote:
    A couple of months ago, I posted on the members-only Coaching Exchange that it was our intention to upgrade the ...
  • 1 comment on this entry:
    • Randy Carson said:
      Looking forward to seeing the new course and content ...

  • Change #1: New Consulting Times Site
    Mollie Wasserman wrote:
    We are busy putting together a new, expanded, and more user friendly Consulting Times. Here are just two of the ...

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Mollie Wasserman published on April 1, 2007 12:02 PM.

Real Estate Vs. Financial Planning: Looking Ahead was the previous entry in this blog.

Information without guidance leads to disaster is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

For Consumers

Welcome to the Blog about the future of real estate as described in Ripping the Roof Off Real Estate.

Empowering consumers with the knowledge that there is a different way to purchase real estate services that simply makes more sense.

Order your copy of

Go to Ripping The Roof Off Real Estate site How a multi-
billion-dollar
industry came
to have an
identity crisis


Available now at Amazon or
Barnes&Noble

The ACRE® Designation

ACRE Logo
Accredited Consultant
in Real Estate


Is your agent an ACRE®?
Read what our clients are saying

For Real Estate Professionals

Begin the journey to transform your business

Are you ready to become the next ACRE®? Enroll now.

Need more information? Watch the following YouTube video and then come back and explore The Times.

Why become an ACRE®?

Click here to watch the YouTube vdeo

For real estate professionals:
 » Introduction to Consulting
 » The ACRE® Course & Coaching

Get the Newsletter
Email 
       Newsletter icon
RE Professionals: Subscribe to our free consulting newsletter - the ACRE® ALERT

(what is SafeSubscribe?)
See a sample in a new window.

Get Notified

By email notice (Your email never disclosed, ever! Opt out anytime)

All new articles and comments published in:
Reserved (old pro)