Times Community » About commissions » Consulting and Limited Service

Consulting and Limited Service

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes

Filed in:

Limited service is not a bad thing if that is what the consumer needs. I call it CHOICE.

One of the ACRE® Grads on our Graduate Coaching Exchange recently posted the following: "I have been talking up this whole consulting idea within my office and the other agents are so critical, suggesting that I am advocating limited service brokerage. And while I am saying no way, I am having trouble defending my position. HELP!"

This ACRE® Grad voiced a real concern that a lot of our ACRE™'s have when their colleagues talk about them doing "limited service". They wonder if maybe their clients are thinking the same thing, in fact their real concern can be expressed as this: "Is consulting limited service?".

I think the answer to that question is that Consulting in some cases CAN be limited service and there is nothing wrong with that, in and of itself. The problem is that the term "Limited Service" has gotten a bad name from MLS Entry Only which throws someone in the MLS (a functionary task where someone pays big bucks for 15 minutes of typing), but often leaves them without vital fiduciary counsel. It usually makes the consumer feel used when all is said and done.

In a way, one could compare the practice to prostitution. Think about it: a woman sells her body because that is what is "marketable" when her real value (and the value of all humans) lies in her mind and personality - the person she is. The "john" spends a lot of money to "have" her, but all he really got for his money was the facade - her body is not who she is.

When sellers spend a few hundred dollars to be listed in the MLS, they are led to believe that they are getting the benefits of the MLS for a fraction of the price. Most of the time they are disappointed because the fiduciary representation and care is where the value of having an agent is - not the entry itself. Agents know this, which is why most cringe at the idea of "limited service" because they equate it to be MLS Entry only.

But limited service, in and of itself, is not a bad thing because sometimes that is what the consumer needs. I call it CHOICE. Sometimes a seller finds their own buyer - and I think that as matchmaking services on sites such as Google Base, Craig's List, and Yahoo contintue to proliferate - that this will happen more and more. The seller doesn't NEED a full service package - they NEED help in negotiating and troubleshooting, in other words, the vital contract to close counsel and care.

Our industry's refusal to provide this "limited service" does not shut down this need. It simply throws these sellers into the arms of attorneys (who can't do this as well as we can and often charge twice as much) or leaves them without any help (which causes them to lose a lot of money).Sometimes a seller wants to do their own feature sheets or digital photography - should this mean that they have to do without an agent's negotiating and troubleshooting skills?

Homeowners have to make remodeling decisions which cries out for the knowledge that a real estate pro can offer. A few hundred dollars spent for a couple of hours of consulting would be money well spent to ensure they were making the right decisions. Does the industy's refusal to provide this "limited service" take away this need? No, but the consumer loses because they often put their money in the wrong places and it shows up a few years later when they go to sell.

Unassisted buyers often fall in love with a FSBO (For Sale By Owner) and would be glad to pay a professional for a few hours of help in negotiating an offer and making sure everything is in place so they don't lose their deposit or the house. And wouldn't the FSBO be happy to have that fee included in the transaction, especially since it would be a much more reasonable cost than the standard co-broke? Who loses when we don't offer this "limited service"? The buyer does, the FSBO often does, and the real estate industry does. I maintain that we have lost untold amounts of money over the years because we don't offer choices.

The real estate industry by in large thinks that if we don't "give in", that people will be forced into a full package, paid by commission. I'm sorry - those days are over. In the Internet world, there are a growing number of alternatives. The alternatives may not be near as good as a real estate professional but our refusal to address these needs only sends the public to others.

The heart of consulting is listening to the consumer's needs and then presenting alternatives. Each alternative has it's plusses and minuses. If you have set up your hourly rate and fees correctly, it will not matter to you what they choose, you win because they are choosing you because you give them the best thing in the world - responsible transparent CHOICES.

Questions?

Recent Entries

  • Is anyone going to Inman Connect in January?
    Hilary Stokes wrote:
    The price is pretty steep, but the sessions look pretty good. I may consider going if other ACREs will be ...
  • A New Beginning for ACRE®
    Mollie Wasserman wrote:
    Instead of issuing a formal Press Release, reprinted here is the communication sent out to ACRE®s today: *********************************************** "When ...
  • AR Post about charging a retainer fee
    Charita Cadenhead wrote:
    I think you all will find this post very interesting and I hope our voices will be heard loud and ...
  • 2 comments on this entry:
    • Jennifer Allan said:
      Every time I see one of these (and related) conversations, it inspires me more and more to create a place ...>/li>
    • Glenn Freezman said:
      wow, that was a kick a$$ conversation. Befuddling insofar as the overwhelming majority say YES and the overwhelming majority also ...>/li>

  • How the 99 Cent Song Saved the Music Industry and What Real Estate Can Learn
    Mollie Wasserman wrote:
    With the death of Steve Jobs, much has been written about the incredible contributions he made to the computer industry. ...
  • Some Day We'll Look Back at This and It Will All Seem Funny
    Glenn Freezman wrote:
    Bruce Springsteen's' Rosalita  was just playing on the radio, the line, "Some Day We'll Look Back on This and It ...

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Mollie Wasserman published on May 26, 2007 12:34 PM.

Restraint of trade or consumer protection? was the previous entry in this blog.

Myth 1: You must have an agent is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

For Consumers
Welcome to our Community; all about the future of real estate as described in The End of 6%.

Empowering consumers with the knowledge that there is a different way to purchase real estate services that simply makes more sense.

Available Now!

How to Get the
Real Estate
Expertise You
Need Without
Paying
Commission

This book could save you $1,000's

The ACRE® Designation

ACRE Logo
Accredited Consultant
in Real Estate

Is your agent an ACRE®?
Read what our clients are saying

Are you the next ACRE®?

Begin the journey to transform your business

Are you ready to become the next ACRE®? Enroll now.

Need more information? Watch the following videos.

About the ACRE® program

Click here to watch the YouTube vdeo

For real estate professionals:
 » Introduction to Consulting
 » The ACRE® Course & Coaching

Get the Newsletter
Email 
       Newsletter icon
RE Professionals: Subscribe to our free consulting newsletter - the ACRE® ALERT

(what is SafeSubscribe?)
See a sample in a new window.

Get Notified

Subscribe to instant email notices of all new articles and comments published in the Times Community

(Your email never disclosed. Opt out anytime)