Times Community » About commissions » Opinions » Stop Explaining a Commission as a Payment for Services. It's Not!

Stop Explaining a Commission as a Payment for Services. It's Not!

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes

Filed in:

"Don't get too close to me...I have a cold!" We have believed for so long that breathing the same air will spread germs, that it's almost a given. But if you talk to medical professionals, they will tell you that colds and viruses are rarely spread by breathing the same air. It's the exchange of body fluids that spread the germs.

In our profession, we have been told, and continue to tell the consumer, that a commission is a payment for services rendered. We've repeated it for so long that, almost universally, we believe it to be true. But logically, it's not. The consumer knows this and with a tight economy, they are increasingly asking some very logical questions:

"If I price my home where you tell me to, get it in tip-top condition, and make it easy to show, why am I paying the same thing as the guy down the street who does none of these things?"

"When my $600k home sells, I will be paying twice as much as my cousin across town who is selling a $300k home. Why is that? Do you do twice as much work? Or put in twice as much time?"

"If, as a buyer, I do my own driveby's and narrow down my choices so you only take me out once to find a home, why do you get paid the same as you would if you work with a buyer that required three months of house hunting trips?"

As I stated in Ripping the Roof off Real Estate, when agents complain to their brokers that it's getting more and more difficult to justify their commissions to the public, brokers overwhelmingly just tell them to show the client how much they do for them. And while I would agree that much of the public has no idea how much work is involved in bringing a transaction to the closing table, trotting out a list of the 450 Things That an Agent Does misses the point.

The commission system follows the basic rule of Economics 101: high risk must be paired with high reward. We shoulder all of the risk but get paid a high reward if successful. That's why discounting one's commission without reducing the risk we shoulder is often such a bad deal.

Here's the stark truth that we need to face head on: a commission has nothing to do with compensating an agent for time or services. Commissions are all about mitigating risk. Until we, as an industry, are willing to call it what it is, and provide quality, transparent choices in the services we can provide and how we can be paid, we will continue to see our compensation erode and our value undermined. Consumers, not understanding what we're getting paid for, will increasingly try to do it all themselves without the necessary services, expertise and representation that a skilled professional provides.

1 Comment

user-pic

I agree that commissions are really all about mitigating risk. The public is fixated on what we're paid, or more precisely, what they are charged. They fail to realize that we are not paid unless the deal closes.

Questions?

Recent Entries

  • Is anyone going to Inman Connect in January?
    Hilary Stokes wrote:
    The price is pretty steep, but the sessions look pretty good. I may consider going if other ACREs will be ...
  • A New Beginning for ACRE®
    Mollie Wasserman wrote:
    Instead of issuing a formal Press Release, reprinted here is the communication sent out to ACRE®s today: *********************************************** "When ...
  • AR Post about charging a retainer fee
    Charita Cadenhead wrote:
    I think you all will find this post very interesting and I hope our voices will be heard loud and ...
  • 2 comments on this entry:
    • Jennifer Allan said:
      Every time I see one of these (and related) conversations, it inspires me more and more to create a place ...>/li>
    • Glenn Freezman said:
      wow, that was a kick a$$ conversation. Befuddling insofar as the overwhelming majority say YES and the overwhelming majority also ...>/li>

  • How the 99 Cent Song Saved the Music Industry and What Real Estate Can Learn
    Mollie Wasserman wrote:
    With the death of Steve Jobs, much has been written about the incredible contributions he made to the computer industry. ...
  • Some Day We'll Look Back at This and It Will All Seem Funny
    Glenn Freezman wrote:
    Bruce Springsteen's' Rosalita  was just playing on the radio, the line, "Some Day We'll Look Back on This and It ...

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Mollie Wasserman published on June 22, 2010 7:20 AM.

Taking a cue from the Financial Services Industry was the previous entry in this blog.

Why are We so Afraid to Get Paid Non-Contingently? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

For Consumers
Welcome to our Community; all about the future of real estate as described in The End of 6%.

Empowering consumers with the knowledge that there is a different way to purchase real estate services that simply makes more sense.

Available Now!

How to Get the
Real Estate
Expertise You
Need Without
Paying
Commission

This book could save you $1,000's

The ACRE® Designation

ACRE Logo
Accredited Consultant
in Real Estate

Is your agent an ACRE®?
Read what our clients are saying

Are you the next ACRE®?

Begin the journey to transform your business

Are you ready to become the next ACRE®? Enroll now.

Need more information? Watch the following videos.

About the ACRE® program

Click here to watch the YouTube vdeo

For real estate professionals:
 » Introduction to Consulting
 » The ACRE® Course & Coaching

Get the Newsletter
Email 
       Newsletter icon
RE Professionals: Subscribe to our free consulting newsletter - the ACRE® ALERT

(what is SafeSubscribe?)
See a sample in a new window.

Get Notified

Subscribe to instant email notices of all new articles and comments published in the Times Community

(Your email never disclosed. Opt out anytime)