Choice: Risk Vs. Reward

Author: Mollie Wasserman
Date: April 1, 2007 12:02 PM
Permalink:
You can be the first to comment.
Paying a full commission is like buying an insurance policy ... it can be very expensive.

In real estate, quality is essential for keeping the most money in your pocket when you ultimately close. But should that mean that you are locked into paying by commission in order to get that quality? I believe the answer should be no.

Of course, after you have explored and weighed different options, based on your individual needs and comfort level, you may find, as many consumers do, that a traditional commission is the best choice for you. And that's perfectly fine. But you should make that choice because it's the BEST option, not because it's the ONLY option.

There is no question that when you pay for real estate services either by a flat fee or by the hour, you can save a lot of money. But unlike using a discount agent who agrees to cut their commission, you don't have to sacrifice the number OR the quality of the services you receive. Why is this? Because by choosing a flat fee for a bundle of services, or paying by the hour, you are receiving and paying for only the services or the time received. You are NOT receiving a guaranteed outcome, but, you also do not have to pay a premium for that guarantee - the "insurance" that if you don't achieve the desired outcome, you pay nothing. Therein lies the savings.

Actually, paying for services by fee or by the hour isn't that radical an idea. If you think about it, fees or hourly are how most professionals and service providers are paid.

Real estate professionals have traditionally been paid contingent on an outcome, even though no matter how skilled they are, they cannot control that outcome. The simple fact is the initial pricing of a home and the economic climate is what will determine how fast and for how much a home sells for.

Yet, with the traditional commission system, agents are paid as though they could control the outcome and that "insurance policy" of only paying if the house sells is what makes this method of compensation so expensive to the consumer.

When I explain to a potential seller how they can save a lot of money by paying for the time or services of an agent, rather than the outcome, the response I often get is "But what if the agent doesn't do a good job?" By that reasoning, you would have to question whether any service provider would do a good job if there pay was not contingent on the outcome.

As an example, a dentist is paid for their services and expertise, regardless of what dental issues come up. No matter how skilled the dentist is, he cannot control whether you only need twice-a-year cleanings or an abundance of root canals, bridges or implants. He might influence your future dental health by making suggestions on the care of your teeth, but he certainly cannot control what ultimately happens with your mouth; that depends on factors such as heredity and how diligently you care for your teeth. So if the dentist is paid for his services regardless of what comes up, how do you know that he will do a good job? The fact is you don't have a guarantee. That's why you usually don't pick a dentist from the phone book; it's far better to get a referral from someone who is already a content patient.

School teachers are paid a salary regardless of how many of their students ace the SAT's. They are paid, and promoted, based on their teaching skills, not necessarily how many students go on to college.

And so it is with most service providers. Obviously, if you pay for someone's services by non-contingent fee or by the hour, you need to have confidence that that provider will do quality work.

Although some consumers believe that a real estate agent will work harder knowing that they will only be paid if the house sells, the reality is that top-notch REALTORS®, like any other good service provider, work hard for their clients because they have a reputation for quality work that they want to protect and because they want to continue to receive a good share of their business by referral.

Now, I want to be very clear: paying for real estate services by non-contingent fees is not for everyone! As my Mom likes to say "That's why they make chocolate and vanilla." Some people (like my Mom) are risk-aversive, and they are better off paying for real estate services by traditional commission. There is nothing wrong with that as long as they understand that they are paying a premium to have no risk. At the same time, there are a growing number of folks, once understanding that the outcome is not controlled by the agent, whom are willing to forgo the guarantee and pay a lot less by fee, while still getting quality services and counsel.

Note: the above article is an excerpt from my book Ripping the Roof Off Real Estate.

Filed in »

Leave a comment

Powered by Ajax Comments

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Mollie Wasserman published on April 1, 2007 12:02 PM.

Real Estate Vs. Financial Planning: Looking Ahead was the previous entry in this blog.

Information without guidance leads to disaster is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Entries

  • Are You Looking for Value When Comparing Real Estate Services?
    Judi Bryan wrote:
    It's no secret, we live in the world of "big box" alternatives.  More and more, the businesses we've relied on ...
  • 1 comment on this entry:
    • Shannon said:
      It's true, sometimes it pays to spend a little more to ensure the quality of your product - or that ...

  • The Mortgage Mess
    Paula Bean wrote:
    In a recent article in Inman News: Mortgage bankers oppose workouts for bankrupt homeowners, Matt Carter reports that legislation that ...
  • 2 comments on this entry:
    • Richard Burke said:
      Paula, The focus of bailout money is partially misdirected. Some should go to guaranteeing the end investor who bought the ...
    • Terry Osburn said:
      Paula, You make valid points. The simplicity of fixing the problem is entirely complicated by greed. You wrote this in ...

  • Online Referral Sites: What you need to know
    Paula Bean wrote:
    In a recent article, the founder of a leading online real estate referral site, tried to make the case to ...
  • 3 comments on this entry:
    • ACRE COUNCIL said:
      This is a test comment ...
    • Deryk Harper said:
      Hi Paula, Great post. I would love to leave this as a guest post on my blogsite or link to ...
    • Terry Osburn said:
      AMEN!Paula you spoke it like a true Professional and very clearly.... ...

  • Filling the Choice Gap
    Merv Forney wrote:
    Every seller is a "For Sale by Owner." Every buyer is a "do it yourselfer." It is simply a matter ...
  • 1 comment on this entry:
    • Erin said:
      Interesting article. It's interesting to see how real estate professionals are adapting to the changes in the business -- consulting ...

  • Myth 1: You must have an agent
    Paula Bean wrote:
    I recently had time to surf around the Internet and came upon this terrific article regarding the top five real ...
The Consulting Times

Welcome to the Blog about the future of real estate as described in Ripping the Roof Off Real Estate.

Empowering consumers with the knowledge that there is a different way to purchase real estate services that simply makes more sense.

Order your copy of
Go to Ripping The Roof Off Real Estate site How a multi- billion-dollar industry came to have an identity crisis



Available now at Amazon or
Barnes&Noble
The ACRE® Designation
ACRE Logo
Accredited Consultant
in Real Estate


Is your agent an ACRE®?
Read what our clients are saying

Get Notified

By email notice (Your email never disclosed, ever! Opt out anytime)

All new articles and comments published in:
Consumer Edition Blog